“Controversial Decision – Pundit Weighs in on Leeds Incident vs Burnley”
Paul Robinson Claims Leeds United's Penalty Appeals in 1-0 Loss to Burnley Were Debatable (14 September)

Without VAR in the Championship, referee James Bell opted not to award a penalty when Joe Worrall challenged Manor Solomon from behind.
The decision sparked mixed reactions, with Leeds fans at Elland Road eager for the penalty, but their calls went unanswered.
Speaking to MOT Leeds News, Robinson said, “It was a debatable one.
Some of the ball was taken, but from Leeds’ perspective, you want a penalty.
There’s frustration after the game because, once again, Leeds struggled to break down a team playing a low block.
If Leeds had won 3-1, this incident wouldn’t even be a talking point.”
Should Manor Solomon have earned a penalty in Leeds United vs. Burnley? Fans increasingly prefer the Championship over the Premier League due to the lack of VAR, but this absence can lead to contentious decisions.
In this case, opinions differ. Some commend Bell’s decision, while others criticize it, even after watching replays.
A penalty could have helped Farke’s team get back into the game, but the reality is that Leeds struggled to break down Scott Parker’s organized side.
This encounter between Leeds and Burnley was viewed as a showdown between two teams with promotion and title ambitions, making it a key opportunity to make a statement.
However, Leeds failed to capitalize, and now find themselves five points behind West Brom, who lead the league.
The focus for Farke’s team must now shift to securing points in their upcoming matches if they hope to stay in the promotion race.



