Opinion: Postecoglou’s puzzling decision to bench 83% pass accuracy ace for Tottenham v Chelsea
Ange Postecoglou makes a surprising decision to drop James Maddison from Tottenham’s starting XI for Sunday’s clash with Chelsea.

The midfielder has rediscovered his form recently, and while Son Heung-min’s return to the team is undoubtedly good news, it seems harsh—and even bizarre—that James Maddison is the one to make way.
Maddison’s omission is one of four changes to the starting lineup, with Cristian Romero, Micky van de Ven, and Pedro Porro also being named in the team.
Tottenham confirmed the lineup via their official X account on 8 December, as they prepare to face London rivals Chelsea.
James Maddison’s absence from the starting XI is a notable decision as Spurs look to bounce back from their unexpected 1-0 defeat to Bournemouth at the Vitality Stadium on 5 December.
Ange Postecoglou will be eager to guide his team back to winning ways, particularly ahead of a high-stakes London Derby.
Given Chelsea’s strong performances under Enzo Maresca this season, momentum heading into the clash would have been crucial.
Although Son’s return is a boost for Tottenham, Maddison’s exclusion feels undeserved given his recent performances.
In Spurs’ previous Premier League match against Bournemouth, Maddison played 80 minutes and recorded an impressive 83% pass accuracy with 70 touches.
Offensively, he was instrumental, making two key passes and taking a shot during the game.
Admittedly, Maddison lost possession 17 times, but as a player heavily involved in playmaking, this is not unusual.

Defensively, however, his contributions were less effective, completing only 58% of his ground duels and none of his aerial duels.
He was fouled six times and made a single tackle during the match.
While Son is arguably Tottenham’s standout player, Maddison has been a vital contributor this season, directly involved in nine goals.
His omission from the lineup for such a significant match feels harsh, especially considering his form.
Despite some defensive shortcomings, Maddison’s creativity and influence in attack make his absence against Chelsea a surprising decision.



