Opinion: West Ham Face Catch-22 Dilemma After Late Transfer Window Move

West Ham have long needed attacking reinforcements, and many believed Niclas Füllkrug would be the answer.

However, after a slow start and a long-term injury, those hopes faded, leaving Danny Ings to shoulder the burden up front.

Recognizing this issue, West Ham brought in Evan Ferguson on loan for the remainder of the season. However, the situation is more complex than it seems.

West Ham’s Dilemma

Ferguson’s arrival was crucial for West Ham’s progress under Graham Potter, but as a loan signing, it presents an unusual challenge.

While the Irish striker is expected to contribute with goals and all-round play, he will likely return to Brighton at the end of the season.

This creates a paradox where Brighton could ultimately benefit more from the loan than West Ham.

By getting regular game time, Ferguson will develop into a stronger player, potentially helping Brighton compete more effectively against the Hammers next season.

This raises the classic question surrounding loan deals: is the short-term boost worth the long-term benefit of another club’s player?

The Same Problem Awaits Next Summer

While the focus remains on the current season, West Ham must also plan for the future.

With Ferguson set to return to Brighton in the summer, the need for a permanent striker signing will arise once again.

If Ferguson impresses, Brighton will want to keep him. If he underperforms, West Ham will have little interest in making the move permanent.

Either way, the Hammers could find themselves back at square one.

Do they pursue another loan deal for a quick fix? Or do they finally invest in a long-term solution by signing a striker capable of leading the line for years?

The situation will repeat itself in the summer, and how West Ham choose to handle it will be fascinating to watch.